Trailer for your Weekend: Cloud Atlas

Cover of "Cloud Atlas"

The cover of the film’s extremely popular source Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell

 

 

I have not read the book Cloud Atlas, but from all reports it is a sprawling epic, challenging book. One of those unfilmable books that eventually get turned into a film. With the film being co-directed by the Wachowski brothers, and Tom Tyker we are in for something pretty strange and quite possibly utterly brilliant. But really who knows how it will turn out. Could be Tree of Life level brilliance or Love level nothingness. But with that huge cast of big names, this is probably one worth checking out when the time comes.

 

The Bergman Files: Crisis

“Grandiose Drivel”how Bergman in later years described Crisis

A young Ingmar Bergman had to lobby hard to get the opportunity to make Crisis (1946), his directorial debut. The company Bergman was working for, Svenski Filmindustri, were content making B films on the cheap, using contracted actors. But eventually the director convinced them to allow him to shoot this more artistic fare. The screenplay was adapted by Bergman from a play written by Leck Fisher.  Bergman himself described the early part of shooting as “nightmarish”, and paranoid that the others working on the film considered him to be incompetent, he lashed out with repeated fits of rage. The entire process was, in Bergman’s words a “fiasco”. Others agreed, because as a result of it, he was booted out of Svensk Filmindustri.

English: Ingmar Bergman during production of C...

Bergman on the troubled set of his first feature directorial effort.

Despite the horrific shoot endured by the young director, I think the end product holds up very well. The film focuses on the 18 year old and innocent Nelly, who has been raised in a small country town by the piano teacher Ingeborg. Nelly knows that Ingeborg is not her real mother, and on the day the film opens her biological mother Jenny shows up, determined to take Nelly back to Stockholm with her. After getting drunk and disgracing herself at the town dance that night, Nelly agrees to go with her mother, leaving Ingeborg distraught. In what follows, the innocent Nelly is exposed to the darker side of humanity (particularly men).

From the very start, the film is set up as a contrast between the rural and the urban. The opening shots of the film show the idyllic country town where Nelly happy lives with Ingeborg. A town so sleepy and idyllic that the daily highlight is the arrival of the bus. On this particular day the bus brings into this idyll a woman of which “everything about her speaks of the big wide world” – this is Nelly’s mother.  Bergman, perhaps acknowledging his grounding in theatre, opens the film after a short prologue with the voiceover stating “Let the play begin”. The same voice over downplays any possibility of ‘grandiosity’ in the film’s aims soon after when it announces that the tale “really is just an everyday drama”.

Ingeborg and Nelly live a poor life, Ingeborg forever having to borrow money off friends. But their relationship even in the face of this is delightfully tender. Nelly is a dreamer, loved by everyone, particularly the older Ulf, a vet who rents a room in Ingeborg’s apartment. Nelly is wonderfully brought to life by Inga Landgre, who would go on to star in The Seventh Seal (1957) 11 years later. Her joy at the impending dance elicits everything that the viewer needs to know about her, especially the childlike naivety that would be challenged throughout the film. In many ways it is not the arrival of her mother that has the greatest impact on Nelly, but the arrival of her mother’s companion Jack. Initially they appear to be lovers, though it is later revealed that he is Jenny’s half brother’s son. Still later it is revealed that the man may have fulfilled both functions at some point in time. Jack is a smarmy, conniving and extremely narcissistic presence, a stark contrast to the rugged and upright Ulf. The early part of the film is devoted to the question of what really makes a mother. Is it simply the act of giving birth, or is it to do with nurture. In the eyes of the audience there is no doubt that Ingeborg is the real mother to Nelly. But in the eyes of society, things may take on a different reality. Once the action moves to Stockholm, the film falters a little. It becomes unclear as to what exactly is occurring and particularly what the relationship is between Nelly and Jack. In the end, Bergman is right to keep things oblique though as the conclusion brings it all together expertly and in a modern psychological way too.  The way it all plays out is stunning and it manages to work really well without feeling twee.

English: Ingmar Bergman and Victor Sjöström 19...

Bergman (l) with his mentor Victor Sjöström in 1957.

The film shows the genesis of many of the themes that would continue to characterise Bergman’s work. During the film Ingeborg becomes very unwell. She attributes her illness as punishment, some sort of deserved fate because of sin. Bergman’s childhood as the son of a pastor, was in the director’s eyes characterised by these same notions of sin and punishment. Bergman has talked of how early in the shooting he was overcomplicating his camerawork, before iconic silent film director Victor Sjostrom counselled him to keep things simple. The advice shines through in the film, because it is really beautiful, but restrained in its shooting. There is little more technically astute than the occasional simple zoom but it still looks great. The film has a great soundtrack, courtesy of Erland von Koch who emphasises all the melodramatic high points he is required to in the film, and also has some fun contrasting music in the early ball scene.

It is hard to see why Bergman looked back on his first effort with such disgruntlement. Perhaps it was the horror experience of actually making the film or the fact that it bombed commercially. Crisis though is much more than curiosity value, which is the fate of many a great director’s first effort. In fact so assured is the film that it barely even seems like a first film at all. Check this film out, I think that with the intriguing character motivations on offer, it is one that would probably hold up to repeated viewings.

Verdict: Pint of Kilkenny

‘The Bergman Files’ Leaderboard

  1. Crisis (1946)

Want to win two Bergman films courtesy of Madman Films? Check out the details here.

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

 

The Bergman Files: Introduction and Competition #1

This week on the blog, I am debuting a new series of weekly posts entitled ‘The Bergman Files’. As you may have guessed, this series will focus on the works of iconic director Ingmar Bergman. Each week I will review one of his feature film cinematic releases, in chronological order. No small undertaking, with over 40 on that list.

Ingmar Bergman filming 1965.

The great Ingmar Bergman at work.

Why Bergman? A number of reasons. As you would probably guess, I watch a whole lot of films. But even someone who watches as many films as me rarely manages to cover off on a director’s entire filmography. When I think of my absolute favourite directors – Keaton, Malick, Lang, Hitchock, Welles etc – I haven’t even managed to see all of their films. So this kind of systematic approach will allow me to cover an entire life’s work.

Secondly, Bergman is a director who has always simultaneously intrigued and intimidated me. As someone who has at times struggled with fear of mortality, reading the synopses of his films has often put me off ever wanting to watch them. However, The Seventh Seal, the only Bergman film I have seen, is one of my absolute favourites. And whilst the subject matter is challenging, the beauty of the art in that case at least, totally supersedes and reservations I had.

I hope you guys enjoy this long series of posts. Hopefully there will be a few different things going on. I will be inviting some other bloggers to take the reigns for a review or two. The films, even those not on the 1001, will be graded using the beer rating system. And I will be keeping a ranking as I go, of my favourite Bergman film. As always, read, enjoy, share and comment friends.

The other thing that will be happening alongside this series is a couple of competitions. So here are the details for competition number one. Courtesy of Madman Films, up for grabs are a copy of two early Bergman films on DVD – It Rains on our Love and A Ship Bound for India. To enter the competition you will need to engage with the first four blogs I post on Bergman films (for the two films on offer as well as Crisis and Music in Darkness), either on this site, or when I promote the posts on Facebook and Twitter. Entries will close one week after the post for Music in Darkness goes up on the site.

Here are the different ways you can enter:

  • ‘Like’ the post on Facebook for one entry.
  • Comment on the post on Facebook for one entry.
  • Share the post on Facebook for two entries.
  • Retweet the post on Twitter for two entries.
  • Like the post on the website for one entry.
  • Comment on the post on the website for one entry.

I am really hoping that you guys will get involved with this new series of posts, and hopefully this will be the first of a whole bunch of giveaways. Entry is open to anyone, but just bear in mind the DVDs are Region 4. On facebook, only entries from those who ‘like’ the Not Now, I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie will be counted. Same deal with twitter, only those retweets from followers of beer_movie will be registered (this is simply because it is easier for me to contact the winner).

I am really hoping that you guys will get involved with this new series of posts, and hopefully this will be the first of a whole bunch of giveaways. If you have any queries about the competition, or the series of posts, feel free to email me at drinkingbeerwatchingmovie@gmail.com or use the comments section.

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

Trailer for your Weekend: The Hobbit

CG depiction of Gollum created by Weta Digital...

This familiar chap rather ominously features in this week’s trailer.

I, like many people, am a very big fan of Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. So it was with much antipation that I checked out the first trailer for his forthcoming adaptation of The Hobbit.

Have to say though, I was pretty underwhelmed by this. The weird songs, the sheer lack of action or even adventure. Seems like Jackson and co thought a glimpse of Gandalf and Gollum would suffice. Anyone more excited than me by this?

Trailer for your Weekend: Man of Steel

Zack Snyder

Zack Snyder, hopefully he will channel himself on this film, rather than too much Christopher Nolan.

With The Avengersand Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy both out of the way, Zack Snyder’s Superman reboot Man of Steel is probably the most anticipated comic book film in active production.

After the dirge that was Superman Returns, a lot of people are hoping for a Nolan-esque shot of life for Superman. Those financing the film are obviously hoping for that too as he has been brought on as a producer for this film. This could go either way. Snyder, love him or hate him, is one of the most original directors out there. I want to see his take on the Superman universe, with a little of Nolan’s assured touch in there. I do not want to see Snyder, trying to be Nolan. And on the basis of this trailer, that is what I fear may happen – it’s all very Dark Knightey. What do you guys think?

 

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

 

The Arnie one, not the Colin Farrell one

Here in Australia, the remake of Paul Paul Verhoeven’s iconic sci-fi/action flick Total Recall (1990) opens tomorrow. So I thought this was an apt time to take a look at the original. First of all, check out the awesome trailer for it below.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is undoubtedly one of the biggest actions stars in movie history. In my humble opinion, he is also probably one of the top 5 worst actors to have made a living by being an actor. In this film, Arnie plays the most buff everyman in history. When our hero goes to have memories of wondrous vacations to Mars implanted, he ends up discovering that his real memory has been wiped and that he actually was a secret agent who worked on the red planet. The rest of the film follows him as he attempts to piece together his past and who he really is. Thankfully, despite Arnie’s shortcomings as an actor, he is surrounded by some more assured performer chief amongst them being Sharon Stone, who is fantastic as his wife.

Cover of "We Can Remember It for You Whol...

A collection of short stories by Philip K. Dick. Total Recall is based on the title story.

Total Recall is based on the Philip K. Dick short story “We Can Remember it for you Wholesale”. Dick is one of my favourite sci-fi authors and his fiction is generally concerned with ideas about identity, the future and many other things. But it is ideas rather than action that are at their core. It is a little strange then that so many films have been made of his work. Total Recall chooses to dispense with most of the ideas and instead focuses on the action. It is really an action flick with a dash of sci-fi sauce on top. But it is an extremely fun one. The action, despite the sci-fi trimmings, is extremely realistic with cool hand to hand fight scenes and a willingness to show a little blood. Actually a willingness to show a whole lot of blood – this is a very violent film. The film is also really quite funny. Often when it does not intend to be, but there are also some pretty inspired scripted comedic touches as well. The film is a little dated, but no sci-fi film predicts technology completely successfully. And some of the dated aspects are quite cool to see these days – the most 80s opening credits ever, and miniature work, which you never see in this age of CGI everything.

I have to say, I consider this film a fun action romp rather than any form of stone cold classic. Others who saw the film closer to its original release, may be able to give some insight as to why the film is so revered. One thing the film has done though is gotten me intrigued to see what they come up with for the remake. Especially given the replacing of the ultra-buff Schwarzenegger, with the more normally proportioned Colin Farrell and the apparent decision not to have any Mars based action.

So there are my thoughts on the original Total Recall. Definitely try and take the chance to see it before the remake opens near you, and please share your thoughts on both films.  

Verdict: Stubby of Reschs

Progress: 57/1001

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

 

Trailer for your Weekend: Life of Pi

Ang Lee

Ang Lee is the guy trying to turn this literary blockbuster, into a cinematic one.

Yann Martel’s The Life of Pi was a massive literary sensation. The first trailers have arrived for the inevitable film adaptation. Making things a little more interesting though is the fact that the director behind the film is none other than Ang Lee.

What do you guys think about this? I’m in two minds. Visually it looks truly spectacular. But it also looks like it could be far too sentimental. Having not read the book, I am not sure whether or not that is just what is to be expected, or if this is Hollywood meddling with things.

My Favourite… Childhood Film

 Ok, so after a rather too long hiatus (my fault), the ‘My Favourite’ series of posts is back. Up first is the cracking topic of favourite childhood films. This is an interesting one, because often the films you love as a child turn out to be… well ill-advised choices attributable to our youth.

James from Film Blerg writes:

Back in the day, not too long ago, video cassette tapes were all the rage. Frequently, I wore tapes out til the colour had faded and constant static fuzz pervaded the television screen. One film that I repetitively hired from the video shop (until I bought it as an ex-rental) was Problem Child 2. I spent years rewatching this film religiously. It even took a while until I saw the first Problem Child (a much inferior film).

Picking up from the troublesome adoption that surrounded the first film, Ben Healy (John Ritter) and his son Junior (Michael Oliver) have left their home town of Cold Rock and moved into the leafy green suburban paradise of Mortville. Newly divorced, Ben finds no trouble attracting attention from the ladies, as the town has a 50:1 ratio of women to men. Junior is not pleased with this development, wanting the sole attention of his devoted dad.

Junior subterfuges Ben’s multiple dates with much success until the richest woman in town appears. Lawanda Dumore (Laraine Newman) is a Southern Belle with an overly anxious libido, and once Ben appears in her radar, she literally moves in and takes over. Meanwhile, Junior makes an enemy in local school girl Trixie (Ivyann Schwan). As marketed in the film’s tagline, he’s bad but she’s worse. The two battle it out until we meet her mother Annie; the school nurse (Amy Yasbeck). Ben and Annie hit it off immediately, as the score tells us with the sweet sentimental music. But their relationship is fraught from further potential due to Trixie’s rebellious, all-consuming ways, and Ben’s impending marriage to Lawanda. Of course, Junior and Trixie step in and make the necessary changes.

Problem Child 2 is not the greatest film in the world by far, but its energy is playful and wicked. Capitalising on the title, Junior and Trixie are given ammunition to swear, use dynamite and constantly raise their middle ringer. Born wild, Junior manages to not only fuel a propane explosion in a neighbour’s BBQ, but induce mass vomiting on a fairground attraction ride.

The late, great John Ritter is warm and funny as Ben Healy. Ritter has clear chemistry with his off-screen wife Yasbeck, as well as with Oliver. Joyfully, Jack Warden and Gilbert Gottfried return as the obnoxious Big Ben Healy and Principle Peabody, and Laraine Newman is hysterically demented as Lawanda. Like Looney Tunes cartoons, characters are blown up, fall out of windows high above the ground and survive to tell the tale. Simply put, Problem Child 2 is a whole lot of fun and still hilariously enjoyable over twenty years after it was first released.

James Madden is the Editor of Film Blerg. He is currently undertaking a Master of Arts and Cultural Management at the University of Melbourne and is a Screen Editor of Farrago Magazine. James has contributed to countless student and online publications including Portable, T-Squat and Upstart.

 

Jon from The Film Brief writes: 

By most accounts, Cool Runnings is no classic. It’s a pretty straight-forward sports movie, done in an almost deliberately cheesy fashion, following unsurprising twists and turns that one would expect from any sports film. The revered Roger Ebert said about it, “If you like underdog movies, you might like this one. Especially if you haven’t seen very many.”

Cool Runnings

Poster for Cool Runnings

When I first saw Cool Runnings at age 7, I hadn’t seen many movies at all, let alone underdog movies. Cool Runnings captured my heart and imagination in the dramatic way that only a child can experience. I often wonder if, had I seen this movie at, say, age 24, if I would feel the same way about it. Probably not. It’s light-hearted and affable, but completely formulaic, the sort of movie that you sit through, laugh once or twice at, and then forget about it. I didn’t see this movie as a 24-year-old though – I saw it as an eager and impressionable 7-year-old, and I remember being completely inspired by the idea that Jamaica could field a respectable bobsled team.

It helped that Cool Runnings is filled with characters that my seven-year-old self could really relate to (or at least, thought I could). I related to the pain that Derice felt when he didn’t qualify for the 100-metre dash and I related to Derice’s rebellion against his controlling father. The characters were brought to life by genuinely impressive performances by the principal cast: Leon as Derice Bannock, Doug E. Doug as Sanka, Rawle Lewis as Junior, Malik Yoba as Yul Brenner and, of course, the avuncular John Candy as Irv, the forlorn former bobsled champion, sodden with drink and cramped by regret. Cool Runnings was John Candy’s last really noteworthy film – he completed Wagons East and Canadian Bacon before his passing in 1994, but public opinion condemned those in a way diametrically opposed to the esteem that Cool Runnings is held in.

English: Canadian actor John Candy, photograph...

The late, great John Candy

Cool Runnings demonstrates for me the veracity of the aphorism originally uttered by Martin Scorsese – “Cinema is a matter of what’s in the frame, and what’s out.” There are some niceties in the frames of Cool Runnings – the disbelief displayed by all when Derice suggests a Jamaican bobsled team, the hilarious orientation seminar Irv MCs, demonstrating the dangers of bobsledding, and of course the recurring joke: “Sanka, ya dead?”

But, as with all of these “Favourites”, this choice is an intensely personal one. This movie is important to me because I remember practising the Cool Runnings song with my brothers, hoping that I’d never get as fat and sad as Irv did, dreaming that maybe one day I could grow up to be a Jamaican bobsledder, too.

Jon Fisher is the creator and editor of The Film Brief and host of The Film Brief podcast which you can find on iTunes. 

 

Tim from Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie writes:

Settling on my favourite childhood film necessitated a bit of an in-depth thought process. Immediately films like Back to the Future, Jurassic Park and the James Bond films sprang to mind. But pondering this more, I realised that these were films I loved from my childhood, that still held up as classics now I am an adult. They were not my absolute favourites at the time though.

Childhood films for me were all about school holidays and the local video shop. When Mum would let you go down to the store and hook up the 5 weeklies for 10 buck deal, or whatever they had going on. And in my mind there were two films that I raced for more school holidays than not – Home Alone and The Sandlot Kids. I think the latter just shaved the former though in terms of favouritism.

My adoration of The Sandlot Kids is somewhat inexplicable. It’s not necessarily considered a classic, though I am sure many of my vintage have fond memories of it. Also, it’s a story of a distinctly American childhood, one dominated by baseball. I really enjoy watching baseball now, but as a kid when I was loving on this movie, I had zero knowledge of it, and zero interest in learning more about it.

The first thing that stood out for me, on a recent adult viewing of the film, is the passion the film evokes for baseball, making

Cover of "The Sandlot"

Cover of The Sandlot Kids on DVD

it the centre of the universe for a group of young boys. The narrative is stock standard kids film fare. The new kid in town, summer vacation, cool kid taking the nerd under his wing etc. But these familiar tropes, delivered through a witty script, are put to good use in showing the value of friendship and the joy of childhood. 

Performance-wise, the film excels, and I think that this explains a lot of why the film still holds up for me when watching today. Dennis Leary and Karen Allen of Indiana Jones are wonderful choices for the parents of the main character Scotty Smalls. And the performances by a number of the kids are really great actually. Chief amongst them are the charismatic leader of the pack Benny played by Mike Vitar, and the wonderful Patrick Renna (who is somewhat ubiquitous in family films of this vintage) as the hilarious Ham.

Re-watching this recently, I can see why I was such a fan of it as a kid. Everything is done with so much charm and I still absolutely love the film.

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

Trailer for your Weekend: Love

English: A photo of Tom DeLonge at an Angels &...

Tom DeLonge – member of Blink 182 and founder of Angels and Airwaves, the band behind this fim.

It is so nice that in this age of endless trailers online, something can still creep up and surprise you. The trailer for Love did just that when I saw it at the cinema the other week. This beguiling looking film comes out of the work of the band Angels and Airwaves, the side project of one of the members of Blink 182. What an awesomely strange source for a film! The film looks incredible, and extremely ambitious, spanning history and the universe. I think the film has been available in various forms for a while now, but it is getting a cinema release here in Australia very soon, and I for one will be lining up to check it out. Thoughts on this one?

Worth Watching July 2012

     Worth Watching:

  • Not Suitable for Children (2012), Peter Templeman – A cracker of a script brings this inner-west Sydney comedy to life. Not afraid to confound expectations, the film also delivers a healthy quota of genuine laughs. Refreshingly frank about booze, drugs and sex this excellently performed piece is the kind of Aussie film you really hope finds an audience.  Also features the most fantastically awkward sex scene ever.
  • East West 101: Season 1 (2007), Steve Knapman & Kris Wyld – This is an intriguing Aussie cop drama. There are definitely annoyances – shaky, hyperkinetic camerawork and individual storylines that are not always satisfying – but the storyline of Malik and his father is really well drawn out. The exploration of race, despite some initial clumsiness, also comes to satisfy by the season’s excellent (and genuinely shocking) conclusion.
  • This Means War (2012), McG – I’m a big fan of all three leads in this – Pine, Witherspoon and Hardy. This is nice and light, there is no real sense of tension but the action scenes are good. The script is not great, especially the early establishment of Pine’s character and the motivation of all the characters is often warped. But in the end, this is genuinely funny and well performed, with Chelsea Handler as Witherspoon’s best friend almost stealing the show.
  • The Amazing Spiderman (2012), Marc Webb – This is a fun film that looks great. But there is no denying that much of what is covered was done better by the first Raimi film. Andrew Garfield is a little hit and miss in the title role but Emma Stone is her usual delightful self. Unfortunately very little of the welcome humour that characterised the trailer is transferred to the final film. But despite all of this, the film is still more than enjoyable enough popcorn fluff.
  • Batman Begins (2005), Christopher Nolan – This incredible film has come to sit somewhat unfairly in the shadow of its phenomenal sequel. Nolan’s first Batman flick is a really dense, multifaceted origin story which remains extremely accessible to non-comic book readers. The script expertly establishes the characters’ values and psychology above all. Katie Holmes’ performance in this is really underrated; I think she does better than Maggie Gyllenhaal who replaced her in the sequel. The film finishes on one of my all time favourite sequel setups as well.
  • The Dark Knight Rises (2012), Christopher Nolan – As a standalone film, this is imperfect. However as the closing film of the trilogy, it is pretty darn close to perfection. The quibbles for me include the late twist, OWS references which veer into the overwrought and resolution of the main action that is not 100% successful. But I loved much of this. There is a couple of cracking action set pieces, the setup for the sidequel/spinoff is masterful and personally I was a huge fan of the ending. Michael Caine is amazing in a small role whilst Joseph Gordon-Levitt in detective mode is very good.
  • Magic Mike (2012), Steven Soderbergh – I really liked this. On the surface this is a tale of male strippers. But there’s some (not too much) added depth here. Channing Tatum has a real charm and presence about him onscreen, as does female lead Cody Horne who is delightful despite occasional stilted line delivery. Biggest accolades must go to director Soderbergh though who is in good form, keeping proceedings zipping along rapidly, even as the action threatens to become predictable.

Not Worth Watching:

  •  Brave (2012), Mark Andrews & Brenda Chapman – As far as animated films go, this is decidedly average. For a Pixar film it is utter pants. Technically, they continue to improve but it seems too much effort has gone into making Merida’s hair look amazing, and not enough into making the narrative amazing. This is a tepid tale, totally lacking in any Pixar distinctiveness or subversiveness.
  • Safe House (2012), Daniel Espinosa – Cool idea. A CIA traitor just saunters into the American embassy in South Africa. Especially when you add in the fact that the traitor is played by none other than Denzel Washington. But this film never gets off the ground, making you wonder why anyone bothered. The action scenes are surprisingly sparse, and when they arrive they are annoyingly, shakily shot. Denzel is surely the most watchable actor of his generation, but even he can’t make this worth your while.
     
Denzel Washington after a performance of the B...

Not even this guy can make Safe House worth your time.

If you only have time to watch one The Dark Knight Rises

Avoid at all costs Brave

 Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.