A Week at Bernie’s Guest Post: The Holiday
The Holiday is a Jack Black film that I was never too enthused about seeing and have never gotten around to it. Fernando from Committed to Celluloid is quite the fan, so check out his thoughts. Please note, this is a slightly expanded version of an article Fernando first published on his site on December 26 2012.
I feel the same about The Holiday (2003) as I do about Love Actually (2003): this is one of my favorite romantic comedies or rather one of my favorite movies, and a must-watch every holiday season.
For the good points, first up, Kate Winslet. One of the most talented actresses working today, Kate can play any character and she excels in a more comedic role. Her chemistry with Eli Wallach (who’s also fantastic) is a joy to watch. Next, Jude Law. He’s charming as usual but gets to show his vulnerable side. Jack Black: wow. His best performance to date (I’ve yet to see Bernie). He’s restrained, very likeable and you root for him to end up with Kate Winslet. Not only that, but you feel he deserves to be with that amazing woman. Also, this being a Nancy Meyers film (love her to death), The Holiday features excellent music, fantastic dialog and yes, insanely beautiful houses.
As for the bad points, I feel kinda bad for putting her here, but Cameron Diaz was the weakest part of the cast. I think the woman is talented but an actress with a wider range could’ve done great things with her part. Also, John Krasinski and Edward Burns were on screen for far too little.
Things do occasionally get ugly. The scenes where Cameron Diaz was trying to cry were neither funny nor poignant. Again, this called for a better actress.
Favorite scene: a tie between the tribute to screenwriter Arthur Abbott (Wallach) and a 3-way call between Diaz, Winslet and Law
Favorite line: (Arthur [Wallach] to Iris [Winslet])
He let you go. This is not a hard one to figure out. Iris, in the movies we have leading ladies and we have the best friend. You, I can tell, are a leading lady, but for some reason you are behaving like the best friend.
Verdict: Pint of Kilkenny
Want to win a copy of Bernie thanks to Madman Entertainment? Check out the details here on how to enter.
Mexico based Fernando is the creator and writer of the excellent site Committed to Celluloid. Be sure to check out his site, and like his page on facebook here.
A Week at Bernie’s Guest Post: Be Kind Rewind
I remember being so excited when I heard Jack Black and Mos Def were doing a comedy together, being a big fan of both men. Misty from the phenomenal Cinema Schminema (killer blog name) takes a look at the results.
Be Kind Rewind (2008) features Jack Black doing what Jack Black does best – running around all crazy like in a feel good flick. The unfortunate part is that the feel good part wears off relatively quickly and the movie goes the way of tedium.
So Jerry (Black) hangs out with his friend Mike (Mos Def) in the video store where Mike works. Jerry’s kind of klutzy and kind of paranoid. After attempting to sabotage a nearby electrical substation, believing its energy to be melting his brain, Jerry becomes magnetized, and when he enters the store the next day, he inadvertently erases all the VHS tapes in the store. Uh-oh! Mike quickly discovers the disaster, and is further pressed when Miss Falewicz (Mia Farrow), Mr. Fletcher’s friend, wants to rent Ghostbusters. To prevent her from reporting a problem to Mr. Fletcher, Mike comes up with an idea: as Miss Falewicz has never seen the movie, he proposes to recreate the film using himself and Jerry as the actors and cheap special effects hoping to fool her. They complete the movie just in time when another customer asks for Rush Hour 2. Mike and Jerry repeat their filming, enlisting the help of Alma (Melonie Diaz), a local woman, for some of the parts. Soon word spreads of their epic remaking adventures and everyone in the neighborhood has a request. Hilarity ensues. Or something like that.
I mean, sure it’s fun at first watching Black and Def redo Ghostbusters with only themselves but as time passes the schtick gets old. Then there’s another storyline about the video store being forced to move or go out of business and another storyline about a jazz musician and then Sigourney Weaver shows up as some government official claiming copyright infringement for all these remade flicks and proceeds to destroy them all with a bulldozer. That was obviously the simplest way to go about destroying them…
Not the best Jack Black flick ever made and certainly nothing noteworthy happening here. Mostly, after having watched I just want to gather up my friends and go remake some classic movies on the cheap. Simple fun for a rainy day?
Verdict: Schooner of Carlton Draught
Want to win a copy of Bernie thanks to Madman Entertainment? Check out the details here on how to enter.
Misty is the creator and writer of the wonderful Cinema Schminema, a blog focusing on fantastic B Movies and the odd classic. Be sure to check it out and like her page on Facebook here.
A Week at Bernie’s Guest Post: King Kong (2005)
I was super hyped to see Peter Jackson’s King Kong remake coming hot off the heels of his LOTR trilogy. Have to admit that I was a little dissapointed, so let’s see how Jon from The Film Brief felt about the film.
“No film has captivated my imagination more than King Kong. I`m making movies today because I saw this film when I was 9 years old. It has been my sustained dream to reinterpret this classic story for a new age.” – Peter Jackson, 2003
I’ve always thought that Peter Jackson’s King Kong – which barely broke even in 2005 despite being Universal’s fourth-highest grossing film ever at the time – would be a lot more popular if more people were familiar with Merian C. Cooper’s original 1933 film. This is, after all, a love letter to that movie. At every step of this lavish, three-hour production, Jackson harks back to not only the original, but the Hollywood that existed during the original’s production; the sleazy film producers, the ambitious but inherently dishonest and exploitative film-maker, the subservient heroine and a male actor who is a shining example of the sexist star system that existed at the time. Jackson makes his version of King Kong more subversive than the original in crafting a strong character out of Ann Darrow, who sees beauty in the giant ape Kong and in his eyes, a reflection of the shortcomings of the world she inhabits.
King Kong is a big picture in the old-school sense of the term. It is, of course, a signature Peter Jackson epic, and at three hours (three hours and twenty minutes extended) is too long. Narratively it’s a bit choppy – I appreciated the early focus on the life and times of these characters in 1933 Depression-era New York City, but as the film progresses there are so many strands that Jackson literally forgets about. The relationship between Hayes and Jimmy, for instance, begins to develop as a touching mentor-mentee before Hayes comes to a grisly end (the black guy is one of the first to go in this movie, disappointingly) and the story is forgotten.
In a way, you can forgive Jackson for giving most of his (human) characters short shrift. This is, after all, King Kong, not The Voyage of the Venture and those who Inhabit It. The world of Skull Island is the focal point of King Kong from the middle third on, and Jackson creates a land right out of a creative 8-year-old’s imagination. The action on Skull Island is detailed and intense, with the mystery of Kong – first as an entity, then as a character – an intriguing hook. Andy Serkis plays Kong in what remains, eight years on, a remarkable technical achievement. Kong himself is the most emotive character in the movie, expressive in his body language, vocalisations and (most surprisingly of all considering the inability of digital rendering to get it right) his eyes. Kong is a wounded and lonely creature, a wild animal that nonetheless has as much right to exist freely as the humans trying to capture him.
At three hours long, King Kong is perhaps a bit too long. Peter Jackson is far too sentimental about his own pictures, and I imagine wouldn’t have too many people close to him willing to tell him that swathes of the movie could do with editing. With regards to the action on the island, it’s a case of too much of a good thing. The hour-plus stretch on the island is everything one could want of a remake of King Kong, and as Jackson’s work tends to do, appeals to the eight-year-old in all of us. There are also plenty of evocations and nods to the original – a fight between Kong and a T-Rex that Merian C. Cooper could only dream of bringing to life, and a run-in with some massive spiders. I’m usually not a fan of throwing in references to old movies (particularly in remakes of said movies), but Jackson manages to strike a balance between appreciation of what things past, and carving a new and exciting way of presenting the material.
Eventually, as the tragedy demands, Kong is captured and returned to New York City. There is he is put on display humiliatingly as “The Eighth Wonder of the World” before escaping and being reunited with Ann Darrow. After chilling out in New York for a while (a stretch of the film that is surprisingly fun to watch and moving) they are hunted down, cornered on the roof of the Empire State Building, and finally Kong is brought down. The final half an hour of King Kong is where the real emotional heart lies, and Jackson treats it with a welcome delicacy that is in direct contrast with his rock-em sock-em treatment of the Skull Island section of the film. This is one part of the movie that he was right to leave as is. All of the film’s thematic chickens come home to roost, and the tragic finale is actually more satisfying than the conclusion of the 1933 original. King Kong is a story that needs to be treated with equal parts of boyish wonder and mature reverence. Peter Jackson is a director that is capable of evoking both of those moods. And while his boyishness is perhaps a reason why he has an aversion to cutting anything from his films, it also allows him to look at stories like King Kong from a unique perspective.
Here is another example of Jackson’s love for the original — a lost scene from the original that he recreated in Merian C. Cooper’s style:
Verdict: Pint of Kilkenny
Want to win a copy of Bernie thanks to Madman Entertainment? Check out the details here on how to enter.
Jonathan Fisher is the creator and writer of The Film Brief website and podcast. Be sure to check out his site as well as like his page on facebook here and follow along on twitter @thefilmbrief.
A Week at Bernie’s Guest Post: School of Rock
School of Rock was the film that first put Jack Black on the radar of many people (myself included). In this guest post, Chris from the fantastic Terry Malloy’s Pigeon Coop sees how it holds up.
Say what you want about Jack Black but when he finds a role that fits, he can give some pretty entertaining performances. School of Rock (2003) doesn’t just fit with him; it’s the perfect fit. When it came out in 2003, Black was at the height of his Tenacious D fame and so the combination of film and over the top music was a match made in heaven.
Granted, if you really can’t stand Jack Black then this film is probably not the one that’s going to change your mind. Black is his usual brash, in-your-face self which many (including myself if not in moderation) can find grating. Yet here it all seems appropriate.
For the uneducated, Black plays Dewey Finn, a wannabe rockstar who essentially commits identity theft to work in a primary school under the guise of his best friend Ned Schneebly (Mike White). Whilst working at the school, Dewey makes the class take part in a ‘special project’, one long music lesson leading up to a Battle of the Bands competition which will allow him to fulfill his rock ‘n’ roll dream.
Yes it’s utterly ridiculous and it would never happen. First of all, there is no way a school would make such an idiotic mistake in letting him teach in the first place. Then, if he did actually manage to get the job, threaten to ruin several children’s education, then basically kidnap them when he takes them to the Battle of the Bands, he would be looking at a lengthy spell in prison – not open up his own music class and suffer no consequences whatsoever. But hey, that’s not really what they were going for so I think it’s fair to overlook all that.
I think the real reason I like this film is that I see myself in Dewey Finn (not like that, stop sniggering). My dream job is to be in a band and therefore I can empathise completely with Dewey and his failed ambition. I’ve been the one noodling away in my bedroom to my favourite bands pretending there are thousands of people looking on, swigging Jack ‘n’ Coke and giving it the devil horns. I’ve even played with actual real people at times but, alas, I’m no rock star and never will be. But I do get Dewey’s frustration and, after all, identification with a character often makes for a better film. However, I definitely wouldn’t have stolen someone’s identity and kidnapped some kids to live the dream. Just making that clear.
Of course, it’s important for a film with rock music as a theme to have a good soundtrack and School of Rock doesn’t disappoint. It has music from legendary rockers such as AC/DC, Black Sabbath, The Doors, Ramones, The Who, and more, which all just add to my enjoyment.
School of Rock is immensely silly but there are plenty of moments that make me laugh, probably more than I should. Is calling a fat kid ‘Turkey Sub’ offensive? Maybe. Is it childish? Definitely. But it still makes me chuckle. It’s a real guilty pleasure of mine but one that I’m happy to admit.
Verdict: Pint of Kilkenny
Want to win a copy of Bernie thanks to Madman Entertainment? Check out the details here on how to enter.
UK based Chris Thomson is the creator and writer of Terry Malloy’s Pigeon Coop. Be sure to visit his fantastic site and like his page on Facebook here to keep up with all his reviews.
A Week at Bernie’s: Kung Fu Panda
From the very first minute, two things are pretty clear about Kung Fu Panda (2008). First, the script delivers a wonderfully spot on pastiche and homage to classic kung fu film conventions. And secondly the voice of Po, the titular ass kicking panda, is one Jack Black was born to deliver.
I’m a real lover of both traditional animation and the more contemporary computer generated stuff. So it is so fantastic to see the lovingly created traditional animation prologue to this film, narrated by Black’s expressive voiceover. In just a couple of minutes, Po is established as a dreamer, who yearns to be a kung fu master like those he idealises. The one criticism I would make of the film is that from this point, it is quite slow establishing the narrative. It is a fantastic, traditional ‘warrior’ journey that the character of Po takes in the film. But for me, it just took a little too long for the conflict to pick up. I think this somewhat ponderous opening half is probably whilst I slightly prefer the sequel over this film. Obviously it had the advantage of not having to set all of this backstory up and I think the resultant higher pace means I prefer that film slightly, over this still really quite good one. But when the conflict does start, so does one of the other great joys of the film – the fight sequences. These are some of the best choreographed in recent memory. All of the characters have their own specific styles which actually manifest themselves in the battles. I can only assume that The Furious Five are very much inspired by the wonderful Five Deadly Venoms (1978) and the fight scenes are similarly influenced by the wondrous martial arts in that movie. They are also ‘shot’ (can you say shot when talking about animation?) with awesome usage of slow motion and freeze frames to emphasise the big blows. I think the filmmakers should have been applauded for all this, because instead of fight scenes just slapped together and tacked on the end, we get intricate chopstick and dumpling battles and other such awesomeness.
It is not often that I talk about performances when reviewing animated films. But Jack Black’s voice performance in this film is really wonderful. He brings so much enthusiasm to the role and uses the tonality of his voice well, but he is not endlessly over the top. Black is also able to convey the trials and tribulations that Po must face on his journey to possible greatness. I’m a big fan of Jack Black’s but he definitely gets too much for me sometimes. I think in many ways animation suits him for that reason. You still get a wonderfully bombastic comedic performance, but it is only channelled through one aspect of the film. The film looks decent enough. Even in just a couple of years though, animation has come a pretty long way. And I don’t think that Dreamworks have ever had the ambition to measure up to Pixar in the visual sense. But watching this film did get me to thinking about Dreamworks, and I think that overall they are actually a quite underrated animation outfit. Of course they (rightly) dwell in the shadow of Pixar. But we are pretty unlucky to have a crew putting out films the standard of Dreamworks, and have them still only be (at best) second best at it. I don’t think they get the credit they deserve though, for making films such as this one, Shrek (2001), Kung Fu Panda 2 (2011), Antz (1998), Megamind (2010), Puss in Boots (2011) and the Madagascar films.
Kung Fu Panda is a whole lot of fun and in a week celebrating the films of Jack Black, it is worth seeing for his turn as Po alone. The intricate and original fight sequences also definitely make this checking out, because they are just not what you would expect from a mainstream American animation film.
Verdict: Stubby of Reschs
Want to win a copy of Bernie thanks to Madman Entertainment? Check out the details here on how to enter.
Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.
A Week at Bernie’s: Intro and Competition
Jack Black is an actor that divides opinions sharply. His schtick infuriates some whilst winning the hearts and minds of others. This week will be a celebration of Mr Black’s films, from the inspired to the erm… less so. This post included, there will be eight posts in all, including a bunch from a few really great guest bloggers. So you won’t be subjected to too much of my writing without respite. However, I will be kicking things off later today with a review of Kung Fu Panda (2008).
To make things even better, thanks to Madman Entertainment I have a copy of Jack Black’s latest film, the inspired Bernie which featured in my top 5 of 2012 last week, on DVD to give away. The way to win is similar to the last few competitions I have run, but I have included the details for you below in case you weren’t reading then. Be sure to enter as many times as you want. Entry is open to you, no matter where in the world you live.
To enter, simply do the following:
- ‘Like’ the post on Facebook for one entry.
- Comment on the post on Facebook for two entries.
- Share the post on Facebook for two entries.
- Retweet the post on Twitter for two entries.
- Like the post on this site for one entry.
- Comment on the post on this site for two entries.
There will be double entries for the Bernie review that will close off A Week at Bernie’s on Saturday and entries will remain open until midnight on Thursday 17 January (Australian time). If you have any questions about the competition, ask me in the comments section or fire and email to drinkingbeerwatchingmovie@gmail.com.
To kick off some entries, tell me in the comments section your favourite and least favourite Jack Black flicks.
Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.
Hold Me While I’m Naked
Hold Me While I’m Naked (1966), directed by New Yorker George Kuchar is an avant-garde film that features on the 1001. The film is available on Youtube (the film is supposedly 17 minutes long, but the versions I could find were only 15), so check it out here before the review if you would like. Or read on for my thoughts before taking the plunge, though be warned I will be giving my own reading of what occurs in the film. Not spoilers as such, just what I took from the film.
Like any avant-garde film worth its salt, Hold Me While I’m Naked does not make a whole lot of narrative sense, at least not in conventional terms. It is up to the individual viewer to interpret the images presented in their own way. I found that the film was a comment on the filmmaking process itself and the manner in which a film is constructed. It is also the psychological journey of a filmmaker as he struggles with the troubles of finishing his movie. His obsessions and hang-ups are both affected by and affect his attempts to complete the film. Obviously, if you wish to watch the film with an open mind then that is the best way to approach it. But if you are looking for a way into the film, consider the aspects and even iconography (there is wonderful shot of a character literally drowning in film) of filmmaking on display. As well as the broader themes of filmmaking, the movie also comments on the specific role of the director as a ‘man apart’. There is a great sequence that shows this isolation as he showers alone, juxtaposed with images of a passionate, ecstatically lustful couple in the shower. This reading of the film is all my own of course and there are numerous other ones, about identity to give just one example.
Technically the film is hyperkinetic. The sharp, jumpy editing (which is really well done) combined with the music gets the film racing along in a couple of different directions. This is no shoddy looking backyard production. When it wants to look fantastic, the film does so. Even the opening credits look fantastic. The film is disconcerting to look at though when one is desensitised from watching mainstream film. It all feels delightfully different, with hyperstylised colours and an abrupt manner of conveying the viewer from image to image.
Hold Me While I’m Naked worked for me as a mish mash of images that provoked thought. Be warned, that if you watch the film, you will need to put in some work to put the images in order and glean your own meaning from them. There is enough filmmaking panache here to make that a worthwhile exercise to invest your time in though.
Verdict: Stubby of Reschs
Progress: 72/1001
Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.
Trailer for your Weekend: The Sweeney
Everyone loves a good crime film and there have been some pretty good ones over the last couple of years. I think The Sweeney has already been released elsewhere but is still a little way off out here. I saw the trailer without really knowing anything about the film at all and was quite excited by it. It looks like this has some pretty dense procedural elements which hopefully will come through in the end. I am less excited by the rogueish cops vs establishment hints. But overall, this looks pretty cool to me.
Anyone already seen it, or have thoughts on the trailer?
Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.
The Cabin in the Woods
If you had of asked me two thirds of the way through The Cabin in the Woods (2012) what I thought of it, you would have gotten a positive answer. It was a good, not quite great and very clever experience. However then the film went and produced one of the most inspired and downright brilliant closing acts that I can recall.
The Cabin in the Woods is a very rare beast indeed in that it functions expertly as an example of both meta-horror and straight horror. Rare is the film that can subvert a genre in this way, whilst also being a fantastic example of the genre at the very same time. It looked like the film had revealed too much too soon. The meta-nature of the entire concept is revealed quite early on. The film is best seen without having too much spoiled. I will do my best to avoid any huge spoilers, but I make no promises. The setup is standard slasher fare. Five college students, each representing an obvious stereotype (stoner, jock etc), head to a creepy isolated cabin in the woods for a weekend of booze, weed and getting it on. Vicious murders ensue. However, basically from the get-go, we know this is not a standard slasher film. The cabin is set in some strange, The Simpsons Movie esque dome and is under constant surveillance by boffins. What initially appears to be a ‘big brother is watching you’ kind of thing soon evolves into something more nuanced than that. These boffins (two of them played brilliantly by Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford), also manipulate the situation, making the murders happen. It is kept delightfully obscure what master these folks are serving though, with hints smattered through the film. I first had the government pegged, then some sick and twisted billionaire who watched these murders for kicks. I’m not saying either of these assumptions is necessarily wrong, but it just shows that the film can take you down interesting thought paths.
That summary gives you the first two thirds of the film, that I thought was really quite good. But I do not think I can sum up the brilliant final third without giving too much away. You simply just need to go and see the film, you really do. The closing act is a cacophony of incredible storytelling, effects and creature design. I know this is all a bit vague and I wish that I could go in to more details of what I thought, but it is impossible to do so without spoilers. The cast throughout the film are basically all really good. I love Richard Jenkins, he is one of my favourites, so it was so great seeing him in this. The five actors who make up the college party – Kristen Connelly, Chris Hemsworth, Anna Hutchison, Fran Kranz and Holden Williams – are all really good too. Chris Hemsworth is good here and continues to grow on me as an actor. I think he has a decent amount of talent to go with his physical presence. I sat down and watched the pretty dire Snow White and the Huntsman (2012) this morning and he was by far and away the best thing in it. Kristen Connelly, an unknown to me, plays the lead character and she is likewise very good, both playing up her slasher film stereotype and creating a multi dimensioned person behind that.
The Cabin in the Woods makes exceedingly interesting use of horror tropes, examining a genre in an exhilarating and enjoyable way. Too often genre examinations in films come out borderline academic and too self knowing. No such issues here. The connection of the contemporary horror film with mythological undertones is made; and shows the mark of a couple of really creative creators at work behind this film. Watch it. I can’t promise you will like it, but you will find an original film here.
Verdict: Longneck of Melbourne Bitter
Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.




























