Monthly Archives: September, 2012

The Bergman Files: Crisis

“Grandiose Drivel”how Bergman in later years described Crisis

A young Ingmar Bergman had to lobby hard to get the opportunity to make Crisis (1946), his directorial debut. The company Bergman was working for, Svenski Filmindustri, were content making B films on the cheap, using contracted actors. But eventually the director convinced them to allow him to shoot this more artistic fare. The screenplay was adapted by Bergman from a play written by Leck Fisher.  Bergman himself described the early part of shooting as “nightmarish”, and paranoid that the others working on the film considered him to be incompetent, he lashed out with repeated fits of rage. The entire process was, in Bergman’s words a “fiasco”. Others agreed, because as a result of it, he was booted out of Svensk Filmindustri.

English: Ingmar Bergman during production of C...

Bergman on the troubled set of his first feature directorial effort.

Despite the horrific shoot endured by the young director, I think the end product holds up very well. The film focuses on the 18 year old and innocent Nelly, who has been raised in a small country town by the piano teacher Ingeborg. Nelly knows that Ingeborg is not her real mother, and on the day the film opens her biological mother Jenny shows up, determined to take Nelly back to Stockholm with her. After getting drunk and disgracing herself at the town dance that night, Nelly agrees to go with her mother, leaving Ingeborg distraught. In what follows, the innocent Nelly is exposed to the darker side of humanity (particularly men).

From the very start, the film is set up as a contrast between the rural and the urban. The opening shots of the film show the idyllic country town where Nelly happy lives with Ingeborg. A town so sleepy and idyllic that the daily highlight is the arrival of the bus. On this particular day the bus brings into this idyll a woman of which “everything about her speaks of the big wide world” – this is Nelly’s mother.  Bergman, perhaps acknowledging his grounding in theatre, opens the film after a short prologue with the voiceover stating “Let the play begin”. The same voice over downplays any possibility of ‘grandiosity’ in the film’s aims soon after when it announces that the tale “really is just an everyday drama”.

Ingeborg and Nelly live a poor life, Ingeborg forever having to borrow money off friends. But their relationship even in the face of this is delightfully tender. Nelly is a dreamer, loved by everyone, particularly the older Ulf, a vet who rents a room in Ingeborg’s apartment. Nelly is wonderfully brought to life by Inga Landgre, who would go on to star in The Seventh Seal (1957) 11 years later. Her joy at the impending dance elicits everything that the viewer needs to know about her, especially the childlike naivety that would be challenged throughout the film. In many ways it is not the arrival of her mother that has the greatest impact on Nelly, but the arrival of her mother’s companion Jack. Initially they appear to be lovers, though it is later revealed that he is Jenny’s half brother’s son. Still later it is revealed that the man may have fulfilled both functions at some point in time. Jack is a smarmy, conniving and extremely narcissistic presence, a stark contrast to the rugged and upright Ulf. The early part of the film is devoted to the question of what really makes a mother. Is it simply the act of giving birth, or is it to do with nurture. In the eyes of the audience there is no doubt that Ingeborg is the real mother to Nelly. But in the eyes of society, things may take on a different reality. Once the action moves to Stockholm, the film falters a little. It becomes unclear as to what exactly is occurring and particularly what the relationship is between Nelly and Jack. In the end, Bergman is right to keep things oblique though as the conclusion brings it all together expertly and in a modern psychological way too.  The way it all plays out is stunning and it manages to work really well without feeling twee.

English: Ingmar Bergman and Victor Sjöström 19...

Bergman (l) with his mentor Victor Sjöström in 1957.

The film shows the genesis of many of the themes that would continue to characterise Bergman’s work. During the film Ingeborg becomes very unwell. She attributes her illness as punishment, some sort of deserved fate because of sin. Bergman’s childhood as the son of a pastor, was in the director’s eyes characterised by these same notions of sin and punishment. Bergman has talked of how early in the shooting he was overcomplicating his camerawork, before iconic silent film director Victor Sjostrom counselled him to keep things simple. The advice shines through in the film, because it is really beautiful, but restrained in its shooting. There is little more technically astute than the occasional simple zoom but it still looks great. The film has a great soundtrack, courtesy of Erland von Koch who emphasises all the melodramatic high points he is required to in the film, and also has some fun contrasting music in the early ball scene.

It is hard to see why Bergman looked back on his first effort with such disgruntlement. Perhaps it was the horror experience of actually making the film or the fact that it bombed commercially. Crisis though is much more than curiosity value, which is the fate of many a great director’s first effort. In fact so assured is the film that it barely even seems like a first film at all. Check this film out, I think that with the intriguing character motivations on offer, it is one that would probably hold up to repeated viewings.

Verdict: Pint of Kilkenny

‘The Bergman Files’ Leaderboard

  1. Crisis (1946)

Want to win two Bergman films courtesy of Madman Films? Check out the details here.

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.

 

The Bergman Files: Introduction and Competition #1

This week on the blog, I am debuting a new series of weekly posts entitled ‘The Bergman Files’. As you may have guessed, this series will focus on the works of iconic director Ingmar Bergman. Each week I will review one of his feature film cinematic releases, in chronological order. No small undertaking, with over 40 on that list.

Ingmar Bergman filming 1965.

The great Ingmar Bergman at work.

Why Bergman? A number of reasons. As you would probably guess, I watch a whole lot of films. But even someone who watches as many films as me rarely manages to cover off on a director’s entire filmography. When I think of my absolute favourite directors – Keaton, Malick, Lang, Hitchock, Welles etc – I haven’t even managed to see all of their films. So this kind of systematic approach will allow me to cover an entire life’s work.

Secondly, Bergman is a director who has always simultaneously intrigued and intimidated me. As someone who has at times struggled with fear of mortality, reading the synopses of his films has often put me off ever wanting to watch them. However, The Seventh Seal, the only Bergman film I have seen, is one of my absolute favourites. And whilst the subject matter is challenging, the beauty of the art in that case at least, totally supersedes and reservations I had.

I hope you guys enjoy this long series of posts. Hopefully there will be a few different things going on. I will be inviting some other bloggers to take the reigns for a review or two. The films, even those not on the 1001, will be graded using the beer rating system. And I will be keeping a ranking as I go, of my favourite Bergman film. As always, read, enjoy, share and comment friends.

The other thing that will be happening alongside this series is a couple of competitions. So here are the details for competition number one. Courtesy of Madman Films, up for grabs are a copy of two early Bergman films on DVD – It Rains on our Love and A Ship Bound for India. To enter the competition you will need to engage with the first four blogs I post on Bergman films (for the two films on offer as well as Crisis and Music in Darkness), either on this site, or when I promote the posts on Facebook and Twitter. Entries will close one week after the post for Music in Darkness goes up on the site.

Here are the different ways you can enter:

  • ‘Like’ the post on Facebook for one entry.
  • Comment on the post on Facebook for one entry.
  • Share the post on Facebook for two entries.
  • Retweet the post on Twitter for two entries.
  • Like the post on the website for one entry.
  • Comment on the post on the website for one entry.

I am really hoping that you guys will get involved with this new series of posts, and hopefully this will be the first of a whole bunch of giveaways. Entry is open to anyone, but just bear in mind the DVDs are Region 4. On facebook, only entries from those who ‘like’ the Not Now, I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie will be counted. Same deal with twitter, only those retweets from followers of beer_movie will be registered (this is simply because it is easier for me to contact the winner).

I am really hoping that you guys will get involved with this new series of posts, and hopefully this will be the first of a whole bunch of giveaways. If you have any queries about the competition, or the series of posts, feel free to email me at drinkingbeerwatchingmovie@gmail.com or use the comments section.

Like what you read? Then please like Not Now I’m Drinking a Beer and Watching a Movie on facebook here.